so i think i've come to some sort of realization. as much as i've tried to make myself think otherwise, i believe i like patterns more than solids. i've always felt like i'd prefer solids, and i used to tell myself that it was just more difficult to find solid colors, but i'm finally taking the first step and admitting that when given the choice, i go for patterns (and especially patterned shoes). whew, i can't believe i just said that.
blouse: TJ Maxx // skirt: target // belt: vintage, thrifted // shoes: chelsea crew via modcloth
the weather is beautiful, and while summer clothes still suit the temperatures, they don't suit my mood. but, i can't exactly put on cozy cardigans and boots without the guarantee of smelling like an armpit. so that's why i loved this outfit; sleeves and closed toed shoes, but still lightweight and comfortable and no offensive armpit odors. win!
what i'd like to be wearing
no, it's not mint green skinny jeans, zara heels, sheer blouses or arm parties; what i'd like to be wearing are these awesome vintage finds and handmade pieces! it's probably a little nuts that i spent the morning browsing the internet for all of the things i'd like to have after i spent the weekend going through closets and drawers getting rid of all the things i don't need! i may have a problem...
from the top: vintage dress, booties, sunglasses, purse, blouse, ring, panties, dress
aside from cleaning out clothes and shoes i don't need, i also cleaned the rest of my house (yay) and ate ice cream, ice cream, ice cream, and ice cream. oh, and watched movies. it was a pretty low key weekend, but that's how i like it! how was your weekend?
from the top: vintage dress, booties, sunglasses, purse, blouse, ring, panties, dress
aside from cleaning out clothes and shoes i don't need, i also cleaned the rest of my house (yay) and ate ice cream, ice cream, ice cream, and ice cream. oh, and watched movies. it was a pretty low key weekend, but that's how i like it! how was your weekend?
Labels:
b.a.i.t. footwear,
clothes,
handmade,
shoes,
tumbleweeds,
vintage
a woman's right to shoes
so yesterday's post was serious, and today's post is, uh, ridiculous. maybe. i hope you're a fan of sex and the city so you can understand the silver shoe thing! when i watched the episode "a woman's right to shoes," where carrie's beautiful new silver jeweled manolo blahnik peep toes were stolen from the party, i fell in love with those shoes, and although i didn't know when - if ever - i'd have the need for silver jeweled peep toes, i knew i wanted some. so fast forward a few years until now, and guess what, i actually do need silver heels!
this is the ultimate in frivolity, so bear with me. i haven't forgotten about those heels all these years later, but like i said, i didn't need a pair as i'm sure they wouldn't be worn much. on saturday i met my sister, my stepmom, and one other bridesmaid for a dress fitting for my sister's wedding next june (p.s. i'm going to be a bridesmaid). when i asked her what type of shoes we were to wear and she said, "it doesn't matter what style they are as long as they're silver," i think my heart skipped a beat. that meant i now had a legitimate, bonafide reason to own shoes like carrie's!
so here's the thing: i can be incredibly impulsive when i decide i want something. my sister's wedding isn't until next june, so i truly don't need these now. BUT, i have a difficult, if not impossible time finding shoes in my size (5), and i found a pair that's not only my size, but it's a steal of a price, AND they are so similar to carrie's manolos that i bet i could trick someone into thinking they are real (but obviously joking is no friend of mine. obviously.)! but there is only 1 left in my size. so what do i do? buy them now and covet them forever or let them go and wait until closer to the wedding date to start shopping for their twin? HELP!
this is the ultimate in frivolity, so bear with me. i haven't forgotten about those heels all these years later, but like i said, i didn't need a pair as i'm sure they wouldn't be worn much. on saturday i met my sister, my stepmom, and one other bridesmaid for a dress fitting for my sister's wedding next june (p.s. i'm going to be a bridesmaid). when i asked her what type of shoes we were to wear and she said, "it doesn't matter what style they are as long as they're silver," i think my heart skipped a beat. that meant i now had a legitimate, bonafide reason to own shoes like carrie's!
so here's the thing: i can be incredibly impulsive when i decide i want something. my sister's wedding isn't until next june, so i truly don't need these now. BUT, i have a difficult, if not impossible time finding shoes in my size (5), and i found a pair that's not only my size, but it's a steal of a price, AND they are so similar to carrie's manolos that i bet i could trick someone into thinking they are real (but obviously joking is no friend of mine. obviously.)! but there is only 1 left in my size. so what do i do? buy them now and covet them forever or let them go and wait until closer to the wedding date to start shopping for their twin? HELP!
Labels:
carrie bradshaw,
heels,
manolo blahnik,
SATC,
sex and the city,
shoes,
wedding
a little bit of truth
i'm sure you probably know by now that i prefer silliness to seriousness, but sometimes i have to put on my big girl pants and save the laughter for later.
i don't look at my blog as my personal space to air dirty laundry, but i do feel that i have a voice here, albeit small, and there are some things that just need to be shared - like a public service announcement, if you will. last week my sale and business with a one-word name flash sale site was officially over, and it left me with a bad taste in my mouth - like lemon rind marinated in trickery. to receive payment for sales, i had to confirm the payment amount, only the amount i had was significantly higher than the amount that site had calculated.
the buyers from the site explain to (potential) sellers that items are sold on their site for 4 days at a discounted rate (set by the seller), and then the site takes 20% of the retail price. the seller submits retail prices, discount percentages, and sale prices, and then verifies that the site has received the correct information. sounds simple enough, right? i thought so, too. i began to worry about potential problems as soon as the sale went live; my balancing print for example has a retail price of $21, and should have been put on sale for $17.22, only i noticed that the retail price was set at $32 and the sale, or "discounted" price, was set at $27.99. clearly that's not a sale at all seeing as how it's $6.99 higher than the retail price in my shop. so i contacted the buyer i'd been working with, but received no response. not having any control over the site, i just accepted that a mistake had been made, and hoped that the prices on the next set of prints going on sale would reflect those i'd submitted. much to my dismay, the retail and "sale" prices were incorrect; instead of the retail and sale prices i'd submitted, $16 and $13.60, respectively, the retail price was listed as $26.99 with the "discounted" price was $18.99.
when it came time for them to send payment for the orders i'd received, i wanted to be sure that i was paid my percentage for the items' selling price. after multiple emails to the site, and multiple vague responses, i was finally told, in a roundabout way, that they will raise prices as they see fit (sellers' prices be damned), and that's why they require sellers to submit and verify their prices BEFORE the sale starts. this means that in addition to them taking 20% of a seller's retail price (which is understandable and explained beforehand), they will also raise the prices and pocket the difference all without telling the seller. this, my friends, was absolutely NOT mentioned in the information provided to me, and it most likely wouldn't have been mentioned had i not demanded to know where the extra money was going after they'd raised the prices on every item in the sale. those thieves pocketed over $100 of extra, free money from my prints, meaning they came out making MORE per print than i did.
i already know how difficult it can be to make a living in the handmade marketplace, thanks to the wal-mart mentality of not wanting to pay an item's true worth, but to think that a supposed "legitimate" site is taking advantage of so many artists and designers by basically stealing from them through underhanded business tactics and not divulging important information makes me livid. my sale is over, my lesson is learned, but my point with this post is to hopefully let other handmade shop owners know the actual details of doing a sale with that site: it's thievery.
had i been informed of the site's practices in the beginning i would have simply said no thank you and forgotten about it, but not being told until after the fact, and in a roundabout way even then, makes me feel taken advantage of. i feel that by not being open and up front, that site is running an unethical business, and i don't want for any of the talented artists i know to be exploited.
because many of my readers are handmade business owners, i felt the least i could do was post this as a warning and review of my experience. while you are the only person who can know what's best for your business, i do urge you to do the math and to really think long and hard before doing a sale with them; decide whether or not you can afford to have anyone - not just this site - potentially profit more from your work than you. handmade is special, it's unique, and a little piece of you goes into every item you make; don't let yourself of your items be undervalued. the end.
i don't look at my blog as my personal space to air dirty laundry, but i do feel that i have a voice here, albeit small, and there are some things that just need to be shared - like a public service announcement, if you will. last week my sale and business with a one-word name flash sale site was officially over, and it left me with a bad taste in my mouth - like lemon rind marinated in trickery. to receive payment for sales, i had to confirm the payment amount, only the amount i had was significantly higher than the amount that site had calculated.
the buyers from the site explain to (potential) sellers that items are sold on their site for 4 days at a discounted rate (set by the seller), and then the site takes 20% of the retail price. the seller submits retail prices, discount percentages, and sale prices, and then verifies that the site has received the correct information. sounds simple enough, right? i thought so, too. i began to worry about potential problems as soon as the sale went live; my balancing print for example has a retail price of $21, and should have been put on sale for $17.22, only i noticed that the retail price was set at $32 and the sale, or "discounted" price, was set at $27.99. clearly that's not a sale at all seeing as how it's $6.99 higher than the retail price in my shop. so i contacted the buyer i'd been working with, but received no response. not having any control over the site, i just accepted that a mistake had been made, and hoped that the prices on the next set of prints going on sale would reflect those i'd submitted. much to my dismay, the retail and "sale" prices were incorrect; instead of the retail and sale prices i'd submitted, $16 and $13.60, respectively, the retail price was listed as $26.99 with the "discounted" price was $18.99.
when it came time for them to send payment for the orders i'd received, i wanted to be sure that i was paid my percentage for the items' selling price. after multiple emails to the site, and multiple vague responses, i was finally told, in a roundabout way, that they will raise prices as they see fit (sellers' prices be damned), and that's why they require sellers to submit and verify their prices BEFORE the sale starts. this means that in addition to them taking 20% of a seller's retail price (which is understandable and explained beforehand), they will also raise the prices and pocket the difference all without telling the seller. this, my friends, was absolutely NOT mentioned in the information provided to me, and it most likely wouldn't have been mentioned had i not demanded to know where the extra money was going after they'd raised the prices on every item in the sale. those thieves pocketed over $100 of extra, free money from my prints, meaning they came out making MORE per print than i did.
i already know how difficult it can be to make a living in the handmade marketplace, thanks to the wal-mart mentality of not wanting to pay an item's true worth, but to think that a supposed "legitimate" site is taking advantage of so many artists and designers by basically stealing from them through underhanded business tactics and not divulging important information makes me livid. my sale is over, my lesson is learned, but my point with this post is to hopefully let other handmade shop owners know the actual details of doing a sale with that site: it's thievery.
had i been informed of the site's practices in the beginning i would have simply said no thank you and forgotten about it, but not being told until after the fact, and in a roundabout way even then, makes me feel taken advantage of. i feel that by not being open and up front, that site is running an unethical business, and i don't want for any of the talented artists i know to be exploited.
because many of my readers are handmade business owners, i felt the least i could do was post this as a warning and review of my experience. while you are the only person who can know what's best for your business, i do urge you to do the math and to really think long and hard before doing a sale with them; decide whether or not you can afford to have anyone - not just this site - potentially profit more from your work than you. handmade is special, it's unique, and a little piece of you goes into every item you make; don't let yourself of your items be undervalued. the end.
Labels:
experience,
flash sale,
handmade,
opinion,
review,
uncovet
a little bit hippie
a little forewarning: for some reason i couldn't manage to take a single normal picture! sometimes i just really, really don't want to be serious. i won this dress on ebay a while back, and after seeing the pictures, i think i am going to go ahead and shorten it a few inches, but aside from the length, this dress encompasses all of my favorite things in a dress: it's from the 70's, it's off-white, it has crochet detail. so basically what i'm saying is - put me in a VW bus on my way to san francisco and i'll be a happy girl.
dress: vintage, ebay // bag: vintage, purchased at an SPCA yard sale (because i love helping animals!) // sandals: kork-ease via ebay // jewelry: vintage, from grandma's jewelry box
and as if my vintage outfit wasn't making me feel 70's enough, i had the three best songs ever recorded in the history of music on repeat - this one, this one, and this one. well, i actually have them on repeat pretty much every day, but it just added to the theme of the day.
so how was your weekend? and are you doing anything for labor day? i am - cleaning out the bathroom closet. fun, fun!
dress: vintage, ebay // bag: vintage, purchased at an SPCA yard sale (because i love helping animals!) // sandals: kork-ease via ebay // jewelry: vintage, from grandma's jewelry box
and as if my vintage outfit wasn't making me feel 70's enough, i had the three best songs ever recorded in the history of music on repeat - this one, this one, and this one. well, i actually have them on repeat pretty much every day, but it just added to the theme of the day.
so how was your weekend? and are you doing anything for labor day? i am - cleaning out the bathroom closet. fun, fun!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)